In this detailed comparison, we’ll explore two of the latest Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 flagship foldable phones: the Samsung Z Fold 6 and the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro. From build quality to battery life, and everything in between, let's dive into the features and capabilities of these cutting-edge devices to help you decide which one is right for you.

Build Quality and Design
Samsung Z Fold 6:
Outer Screen: 6.3 inches
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches
Weight: 239 grams
Thickness (folded): 12.1 mm
Stylus Support: Yes (S Pen)
Hinges: Slightly revised from previous models
Protection: Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on front and back
Water Resistance: IPX8
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:
Outer Screen: 6.53 inches
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches
Weight: 236 grams
Thickness (folded): 11.2 mm
Stylus Support: No
Hinges: Carbon fiber, lighter weight
Protection: Chinese brand shatter-resistant glass
Water Resistance: IPX8

Both phones have narrow outer screens, making typing slightly challenging but manageable. The Z Fold 6 offers a stylus option, which the Vivo lacks. Build quality is excellent on both, with the Vivo having a lighter and slightly thinner design.

Display and Screen Quality

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Outer Screen: 6.3 inches AMOLED, 1600 nits brightness
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Camera: Under-display (4 MP)

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Outer Screen: 6.53 inches AMOLED, 4500 nits brightness (claimed)
Inner Screen: 8.03 inches AMOLED, 120Hz refresh rate
Camera: Punch-hole (32 MP)

Both devices feature high-quality AMOLED displays with smooth 120Hz refresh rates. Vivo claims higher brightness levels, though real-world testing shows similar performance in direct sunlight. The Z Fold 6 has an under-display camera for a cleaner look, while the Vivo’s punch-hole camera offers better quality.

Camera Performance

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Rear Cameras: slow mac 50 MP main, 12 MP ultra-wide, 10 MP telephoto (3x optical zoom)
Front Camera: 10 MP

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Rear Cameras: 50 MP main, 50 MP ultra-wide, 64 MP periscopic telephoto (3x optical zoom)
Front Camera: 32 MP

The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro excels in camera hardware with Zeiss branding and a dedicated V3 chip for image processing. It offers superior image quality, especially with its higher resolution telephoto camera. The Z Fold 6 holds its own but falls slightly short in camera comparison.

Battery Life and Charging

Samsung Z Fold 6:

Battery: 4400 mAh
Charging: 25W wired, wireless charging supported
Battery Life: Around 1 hour and 16 minutes for a full charge

Vivo X Fold 3 Pro:

Battery: 5700 mAh
Charging: 120W wired, wireless charging supported
Battery Life: Around 26 minutes for a full charge

The Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a significantly larger battery and faster charging speeds. Despite its larger battery, the Vivo is lighter than the Samsung. For heavy users, the Vivo’s battery performance is a clear advantage.

Software and Features

Both devices are top-tier foldables with their own strengths. Evaluate your needs and choose the one that best aligns with your preferences.